your data center has it’s own zip code.
your analytics query response time is measured in generations.
running your weekly update report takes 10 days.
your data visualization works best on a billboard.
??
Paige
]]>Thanks! I think it’s fair to say it’s difficult and expensive but not impossible, though in practical terms there may be little difference.
]]>And I learned a lot about it from you, my first mentor. Great to hear from you!
]]>Please go back and read Craig Mullin’s comment above. In the end it is all about which workloads execute best on which servers. As Craig puts it: “if you plan to plough a field and you have a choice between an ox (mainframe) and 32 chickens (intel servers) which would you choose?”
Finally, I discuss the differences between mainframes, RISC, and x86 environments in great detail on my new site: www:workloadoptimization.com. What you will learn on this site is that some workloads belong on x86, some on RISC, and some on mainframes because each server has characteristics that support workloads differently. Further, there are very significant cost implications to choosing the wrong server. To your original point: x86 architecture does not do every job most optimally — so to argue that a mainframe is old and expensive, and that x86 is au currant and exciting, the way of the future, and the only choice the industry needs — is just plain tiresome…
]]>bob竞技体育 |
博彩中特网 |
锦利国际 |
智胜彩票 |
www.亚搏 |
外围足彩网站 |
球探比分即时足球比分 |
博冠的彩的网址址 |
ea官网 |